Is fashion heritage political? And what about its language? They are – both of them, and the EFHA 2022 Symposium ‘Wordings?’, which took place at the beginning of this week, surely proved how important it is to reflect on words when it comes to describing, interpreting, cataloguing objects.
The symposium stemmed out of several conversations that have become more and more pressing for museums and cultural institutions in general: address biases intrinsic to old cataloguing and other museological practices; rethink objects’ institutional definitions and propose new vocabularies to the public; engage with communities and scholars to update biased methods of acquisition and set new standards in cataloguing practices. Since the reconsideration of terminology is leading to a more thorough understanding of objects and their cultural value, we decided to ask our speakers to present different perspective on how words have been used, are used, and hopefully will be used, to propose a varied scenario that, from past to present, can instruct some ways to think about the future of fashion heritage.
The first panel, Establishing Vocabularies, defining identities, focussed on terminologies and projects related to the development of glossaries and thesauri allowing us to access more easily to shared fashion heritage. Between the presentation of past endeavours and the introduction of future projects, the panel ultimately reflected on what goes lost in translation when dealing with objects, artefact and documents that are so linked to national differences and political and commercial agendas, as shown by Matteo Augello and Paula Alaszkiewicz. Linguists and fashion historians helped us defining the identities connected to the linguistic articulation of heritage.