The second day shaped as a discussion on the awareness needed in dealing with fashion and fashion objects especially in relation with the complex and timely issues of appropriation and misrepresentation. Monica Moisin, Hazel Clark, Camille Callison and Janice Deul nuanced the understanding of the dynamic between research, inspiration, creation and production, presenting good practices from the past and proposing ways of moving forward that could redefine the fashion system and allow institutions to fulfil their educational role. Right after these four diverse and inspiring presentations, the roundtable saw the participation also of three more convenors: Filep Motwary, Eva Losada and Andreea Diana Tanasescu.
During the roundtable, each convenor embodied a different ‘side’ of the fashion system, intended as a complex territory encompassing many professions and views, and this variety is probably what made the discussion so vivid and interesting, for the participants as well as for the audience. The discussion started addressing practices of image making and editing, and the way in which fashion imaginaries have recently changed to become more inclusive and respectful of the different identities they come to represent. Creativity – intended as a way of making something new, and also making something visible, served as a link to reflect on “activism” as a common position that curators, researchers, designers and image-makers alike.
All the convenors agreed that fashion’s cultural productions are a fundamental tool to educate and learn, and this is why we have to manage them carefully and imply them in our contemporary understanding of society at large. Fashion is part of our everyday, is a trace we leave behind, is a way of shaping and asserting our identity and, ultimately, is a gateway into the understanding of our culture. Considering fashion, and more precisely fashion heritage in its complexity, as a set of artefacts belonging to particular chronologies and geographies, is a way of reconsidering established – and often, outdated – historiographies.